Seattle Post-Intelligencer LogoHearst Newspapers Logo

The Seattle that could have been: Proposed versions of the city that failed to pass

By Callie Craighead, Zosha Millman, SeattlePI

|Updated
Plans for a vast civic park known as the Seattle Commons was just one initiative that failed to pass in Seattle.

Plans for a vast civic park known as the Seattle Commons was just one initiative that failed to pass in Seattle.

Not all Seattle infrastructure projects pan out according to plan, and many times, Seattleites have only themselves to blame — or thank — for that.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

For example, on this day in 1970, King County voters rejected a bond package known as the "Forward Thrust" which would have built a regional rail transit system heavily subsidized by the federal government. Instead, the federal money was passed to Atlanta's MARTA system, according to History Link.

While we now have the Sound Transit light rail — which will open three new stations this fall and continues expansion in the region — many locals look back at that vote half a century ago as a time when the city could have got a head start on building up a transit system.

But for every bold infrastructure plan or building that makes its way to our city blocks, there are a few ideas for municipal improvement that never made it. From visions of a European-style civic center to a floating stadium, here's a look at some other projects that could have changed the city as we know it for better or worse.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

An aerial view of Virgil Bogue's grand civic center for Seattle. The center would have capitalized on the newly opened area of the Denny Regrade, but downtown business interests opposed moving the city center north.

An aerial view of Virgil Bogue's grand civic center for Seattle. The center would have capitalized on the newly opened area of the Denny Regrade, but downtown business interests opposed moving the city center north.

Seattle (Wash.)/Seattle Municipal Archives

1. Bogue's grand civic center

Seattle would look a lot different — and perhaps more European in architecture — today if engineer Virgil G. Bogue's plans for the city had been passed in 1912.

The Bogue Plan would have plotted out a city with rapid, subway transit lines connecting east to west, north to south and neighborhoods across the city; above-ground rail lines between Everett and Tacoma; and Mercer Island as a whole public park.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

Bogue referenced the great cities of Europe throughout the Plan of Seattle including in his proposed Civic Center at Fourth and Blanchard which would house the city's municipal buildings.

But maybe rugged Seattleites weren't ready for that ambition in the early 20th century, as voters ultimately deemed it too expensive and rejected the far-seeing plan. 

Rendering of the proposed floating stadium.

Rendering of the proposed floating stadium.

Seattle Municipal Archives, Flickr

2. A floating stadium

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

True to the city's maritime nature, some King County official actually supported a plan to create a floating pro-sports, retractable roof stadium on Elliott Bay in 1963, after the success of World's Fair caused architects and city planners to think big.

The proposed stadium would have had a monorail extension from the Seattle Center, and the project would have cost approximately $22.4 million. According to March 1963 edition of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, the stadium would have floated on concrete pontoons similar to those used for floating bridges.

"Our people feel that our area desperately needs a stadium to keep sports in pace with other progress here,” engineer Brian Maither told the P-I. "We checked a map to locate the center of Seattle’s population. But there was no land available in such an optimum spot. So we decided to go out on the water."

Funding — and parking — remained an issue for the far-fetched floating stadium, and voters later rejected a $15 million bond proposal for the idea. The Kingdome would eventually break ground in 1972.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

Another sketch of the R.H. Thomson Expressway, scrapped in 1971, after neighborhood outcry. Pictured is the planned Madison Street interchange, which would have ruined the Central District.
Another sketch of the R.H. Thomson Expressway, scrapped in 1971, after neighborhood outcry. Pictured is the planned Madison Street interchange, which would have ruined the Central District.Seattle Municipal Archives, Flickr

3. R.H. Thomson Expressway

What if Seattle's famous ''ramps to nowhere'' had actually gone somewhere?

In the 1950s, the R.H. Thomson Expressway was designed to link the Central District and Northeast Seattle, with ramps leading to the 520 bridge. However, residents and activists alike protested the expressway, now known as the freeway revolt, saying it would displace people and destroy neighborhoods.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

City leaders nixed the expressway in 1971, dooming the ramps to their "nowhere" state in the Arboretum. But many would say it is a good thing the R.H. Thomson freeway never went through. After all, where would summer swimmers jump from in the Arboretum?

But Seattle's ramps to nowhere were to be torn down by 2016, as part of an major improvement project (though some bits still linger).

Proposed in 1961, it was part of the R.H. Thomson Expressway that was never built. The view is from Laurelhurst looking south.

Proposed in 1961, it was part of the R.H. Thomson Expressway that was never built. The view is from Laurelhurst looking south.

Seattle Municipal Archives, Flickr

Another part of the freeway the never materialized: an ambitious plan for a six-lane underwater crossing of the Lake Washington Ship Canal in Union Bay.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

What South Lake Union might have looked like had voters approved Seattle Commons.

What South Lake Union might have looked like had voters approved Seattle Commons.

4. Seattle Commons

Before Vulcan, Amazon and other tech companies transformed South Lake Union with offices and condos, there was Paul Allen's vision in '90s of a giant urban park called the ''Seattle Commons.''

Supporters dreamed of NYC's Central Park in Seattle, but opponents worried Allen would just get richer, and the Commons lost in two public votes.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

2003 image of the Green Line Monorail plan.

2003 image of the Green Line Monorail plan.

5. Green Line Monorail system

Here's what Ballard might have looked like, if the embattled Green Line monorail had succeeded. The plan — originally for a 14-mile, West Seatte-to-Ballard line — died in 2005, after financing problems surfaced.

Ultimately, taxpayers paid nearly $125 million for a project that never happened.

Advertisement

Article continues below this ad

Callie is a web producer for the SeattlePI focusing on local politics, transportation, real estate and restaurants. She previously worked at a craft beer e-commerce company and loves exploring Seattle's breweries. Her writing has been featured in Seattle magazine and the Seattle University Spectator, where she served as a student journalist.

Zosha is a reporter for seattlepi.com.